• Table of Contents
• Previous Chapter
• Next Chapter

Chapter 4: Namespaces

4.1: Namespaces

Problems like these are usually solved by defining another name, e.g., the function name cosDegrees is defined. C++ offers an alternative solution through namespaces. Namespaces can be considered as areas or regions in the code in which identifiers may be defined. Identifiers defined in a namespace normally won't conflict with names already defined elsewhere (i.e., outside of their namespaces). So, a function cos (expecting angles in degrees) could be defined in a namespace Degrees. When calling cos from within Degrees you would call the cos function expecting degrees, rather than the standard cos function expecting radians.

4.1.1: Defining namespaces

    namespace identifier
    {
        // declared or defined entities
        // (declarative region)
    }

Within the declarative region, introduced in the above code example, functions, variables, structs, classes and even (nested) namespaces can be defined or declared. Namespaces cannot be defined within a function body. However, it is possible to define a namespace using multiple namespace declarations. Namespaces are `open' meaning that a namespace CppAnnotations could be defined in a file file1.cc and also in a file file2.cc. Entities defined in the CppAnnotations namespace of files file1.cc and file2.cc are then united in one CppAnnotations namespace region. For example:

    // in file1.cc
    namespace CppAnnotations
    {
        double cos(double argInDegrees)
        {
            ...
        }
    }

    // in file2.cc
    namespace CppAnnotations
    {
        double sin(double argInDegrees)
        {
            ...
        }
    }

Namespace entities can be defined outside of their namespaces. This topic is discussed in section 4.1.4.1.

4.1.1.1: Declaring entities in namespaces

    namespace CppAnnotations
    {
        double cos(double degrees);
        double sin(double degrees);
    }

4.1.1.2: A closed namespace

Entities defined in the anonymous namespace are comparable to C's static functions and variables. In C++ the static keyword can still be used, but its preferred use is in class definitions (see chapter 7). In situations where in C static variables or functions would have been used the anonymous namespace should be used in C++.

The anonymous namespace is a closed namespace: it is not possible to add entities to the same anonymous namespace using different source files.

4.1.2: Referring to entities

    // assume CppAnnotations namespace is declared in the
    // following header file:
    #include <cppannotations>

    int main()
    {
        cout << "The cosine of 60 degrees is: " <<
                CppAnnotations::cos(60) << '\n';
    }

    using CppAnnotations::cos;  // note: no function prototype,
                                // just the name of the entity
                                // is required.

    int main()
    {
        using CppAnnotations::cos;
        ...
        cout << cos(60)         // calls CppAnnotations::cos()
            << ::cos(1.5)       // call the standard cos() function
            << '\n';
    }

    int main()
    {
        using CppAnnotations::value;
        ...
        cout << value << '\n';  // uses CppAnnotations::value
        int value;              // error: value already declared.
    }

4.1.2.1: The `using' directive

    using namespace CppAnnotations;

While the using directive is a quick way to import all the names of a namespace (assuming the namespace has previously been declared or defined), it is at the same time a somewhat dirty way to do so, as it is less clear what entity is actually used in a particular block of code.

If, e.g., cos is defined in the CppAnnotations namespace, CppAnnotations::cos is going to be used when cos is called. However, if cos is not defined in the CppAnnotations namespace, the standard cos function will be used. The using directive does not document as clearly as the using declaration what entity will actually be used. Therefore use caution when applying the using directive.

Namespace declarations are context sensitive: when a using namespace declaration is specified inside a compound statement then the declaration is valid until the compound statement's closing curly bracket has been encountered. In the next example a string first is defined without explicit specifying std::string, but once the compound statement has ended the scope of the using namespace std declaration has also ended, and so std:: is required once again when defining second:

    #include <string>
    int main()
    {
        {
            using namespace std;
            string first;
        }
        std::string second;
    }

    struct Namespace
    {
        using namespace std;      // won't compile
    };

4.1.2.2: `Koenig lookup'

`Koenig lookup' refers to the fact that if a function is called without specifying its namespace, then the namespaces of its argument types are used to determine the function's namespace. If the namespace in which the argument types are defined contains such a function, then that function is used. This procedure is called the `Koenig lookup'.

As an illustration consider the next example. The function FBB::fun(FBB::Value v) is defined in the FBB namespace. It can be called without explicitly mentioning its namespace:

    #include <iostream>

    namespace FBB
    {
        enum Value        // defines FBB::Value
        {
            FIRST
        };

        void fun(Value x)
        {
            std::cout << "fun called for " << x << '\n';
        }
    }

    int main()
    {
        fun(FBB::FIRST);    // Koenig lookup: no namespace
                            // for fun() specified
    }
    /*
        generated output:
    fun called for 0
    */

As another example, consider the next program. Here two namespaces are involved, each defining their own fun function. There is no ambiguity, since the argument defines the namespace and FBB::fun is called:

    #include <iostream>

    namespace FBB
    {
        enum Value        // defines FBB::Value
        {
            FIRST
        };

        void fun(Value x)
        {
            std::cout << "FBB::fun() called for " << x << '\n';
        }
    }

    namespace ES
    {
        void fun(FBB::Value x)
        {
            std::cout << "ES::fun() called for " << x << '\n';
        }
    }

    int main()
    {
        fun(FBB::FIRST);    // No ambiguity: argument determines
                            // the namespace
    }
    /*
        generated output:
    FBB::fun() called for 0
    */

Here is an example in which there is an ambiguity: fun has two arguments, one from each namespace. The ambiguity must be resolved by the programmer:

    #include <iostream>

    namespace ES
    {
        enum Value        // defines ES::Value
        {
            FIRST
        };
    }

    namespace FBB
    {
        enum Value        // defines FBB::Value
        {
            FIRST
        };

        void fun(Value x, ES::Value y)
        {
            std::cout << "FBB::fun() called\n";
        }
    }

    namespace ES
    {
        void fun(FBB::Value x, Value y)
        {
            std::cout << "ES::fun() called\n";
        }
    }

    int main()
    {
        //  fun(FBB::FIRST, ES::FIRST); ambiguity: resolved by
        //                              explicitly mentioning
        //                              the namespace
        ES::fun(FBB::FIRST, ES::FIRST);
    }
    /*
        generated output:
    ES::fun() called
    */

An interesting subtlety with namespaces is that definitions in one namespace may break the code defined in another namespace. It shows that namespaces may affect each other and that namespaces may backfire if we're not aware of their peculiarities. Consider the following example:

    namespace FBB
    {
        struct Value
        {};

        void fun(int x);
        void gun(Value x);
    }

    namespace ES
    {
        void fun(int x)
        {
            fun(x);
        }
        void gun(FBB::Value x)
        {
            gun(x);
        }
    }

Compilation fails for gun but not for fun. But why is that so? Why is ES::fun flawlessly compiling while ES::gun isn't? In ES::fun fun(x) is called. As x's type is not defined in a namespace the Koenig lookup does not apply and fun calls itself with infinite recursion.

With ES::gun the argument is defined in the FBB namespace. Consequently, the FBB::gun function is a possible candidate to be called. But ES::gun itself also is possible as ES::gun's prototype perfectly matches the call gun(x).

Now consider the situation where FBB::gun has not yet been declared. Then there is of course no ambiguity. The programmer responsible for the ES namespace is resting happily. Some time after that the programmer who's maintaining the FBB namespace decides it may be nice to add a function gun(Value x) to the FBB namespace. Now suddenly the code in the namespace ES breaks because of an addition in a completely other namespace (FBB). Namespaces clearly are not completely independent of each other and we should be aware of subtleties like the above. Later in the C++ Annotations (chapter 11) we'll return to this issue.

Koenig lookup is only used in the context of namespaces. If a function is defined outside of a namespace, defining a parameter of a type that's defined inside a namespace, and that namespace also defines a function with an identical signature, then the compiler reports an ambiguity when that function is called. Here is an example, assuming the abovementioned namespace FBB is also available:

    void gun(FBB::Value x);

    int main(int argc, char **argv)
    {
        gun(FBB::Value{});          // ambiguity: FBB::gun and ::gun can both
                                    // be called.
    }

4.1.3: The standard namespace

Regarding the discussion in the previous section, using declarations may be used when referring to entities in the std namespace. For example, to use the std::cout stream, the code may declare this object as follows:

    #include <iostream>
    using std::cout;

    #include <iostream>
    using namespace std;

Two restrictions apply to using directives and declarations:

• Programmers should not declare or define anything inside the namespace std. This is not compiler enforced but is imposed upon user code by the standard;
• Using declarations and directives should not be imposed upon code written by third parties. In practice this means that using directives and declarations should be banned from header files and should only be used in source files (cf. section 7.11.1).

4.1.4: Nesting namespaces and namespace aliasing

    namespace CppAnnotations
    {
        int value;
        namespace Virtual
        {
            void *pointer;
        }
    }

• The fully qualified names can be used. A fully qualified name of an entity is a list of all the namespaces that are encountered until reaching the definition of the entity. The namespaces and entity are glued together by the scope resolution operator:

  int main()
  {
      CppAnnotations::value = 0;
      CppAnnotations::Virtual::pointer = 0;
  }
  

• A using namespace CppAnnotations directive can be provided. Now value can be used without any prefix, but pointer must be used with the Virtual:: prefix:

  using namespace CppAnnotations;
  
  int main()
  {
      value = 0;
      Virtual::pointer = 0;
  }
  

• A using namespace directive for the full namespace chain can be used. Now value needs its CppAnnotations prefix again, but pointer doesn't require a prefix anymore:

  using namespace CppAnnotations::Virtual;
  
  int main()
  {
      CppAnnotations::value = 0;
      pointer = 0;
  }
  

• When using two separate using namespace directives none of the namespace prefixes are required anymore:

  using namespace CppAnnotations;
  using namespace Virtual;
  
  int main()
  {
      value = 0;
      pointer = 0;
  }
  

• The same can be accomplished (i.e., no namespace prefixes) for specific variables by providing specific using declarations:

  using CppAnnotations::value;
  using CppAnnotations::Virtual::pointer;
  
  int main()
  {
      value = 0;
      pointer = 0;
  }
  

• A combination of using namespace directives and using declarations can also be used. E.g., a using namespace directive can be used for the CppAnnotations::Virtual namespace, and a using declaration can be used for the CppAnnotations::value variable:

  using namespace CppAnnotations::Virtual;
  using CppAnnotations::value;
  
  int main()
  {
      value = 0;
      pointer = 0;
  }
  

Following a using namespace directive all entities of that namespace can be used without any further prefix. If a single using namespace directive is used to refer to a nested namespace, then all entities of that nested namespace can be used without any further prefix. However, the entities defined in the more shallow namespace(s) still need the shallow namespace's name(s). Only after providing specific using namespace directives or using declarations namespace qualifications can be omitted.

When fully qualified names are preferred but a long name like

    CppAnnotations::Virtual::pointer

    namespace CV = CppAnnotations::Virtual;

    CV::pointer = 0;

    namespace CV = CppAnnotations::Virtual;
    using namespace CV;

Nested namespace definitions

Starting with the C++17 standard, when nesting namespaces a nested namespace can directly be referred to using scope resolution operators. E.g.,

    namespace Outer::Middle::Inner
    { 
        // entities defined/declared here are defined/declared in the Inner
        // namespace, which is defined in the Middle namespace, which is
        // defined in the Outer namespace
    }

4.1.4.1: Defining entities outside of their namespaces

To define an entity outside of its namespace its name must be fully qualified by prefixing the member by its namespaces. The definition may be provided at the global level or at intermediate levels in the case of nested namespaces. This allows us to define an entity belonging to namespace A::B within the region of namespace A.

Assume the type int INT8[8] is defined in the CppAnnotations::Virtual namespace. Furthermore assume that it is our intent to define a function squares, inside the namespace
CppAnnotations::Virtual returning a pointer to CppAnnotations::Virtual::INT8.

Having defined the prerequisites within the CppAnnotations::Virtual namespace, our function could be defined as follows (cf. chapter 9 for coverage of the memory allocation operator new[]):

    namespace CppAnnotations
    {
        namespace Virtual
        {
            void *pointer;

            typedef int INT8[8];

            INT8 *squares()
            {
                INT8 *ip = new INT8[1];

                for (size_t idx = 0; idx != sizeof(INT8) / sizeof(int); ++idx)
                    (*ip)[idx] = (idx + 1) * (idx + 1);

                return ip;
            }
        }
    }

Now the function squares can be defined outside of the CppAnnotations::Virtual namespace:

    namespace CppAnnotations
    {
        namespace Virtual
        {
            void *pointer;

            typedef int INT8[8];

            INT8 *squares();
        }
    }

    CppAnnotations::Virtual::INT8 *CppAnnotations::Virtual::squares()
    {
        INT8 *ip = new INT8[1];

        for (size_t idx = 0; idx != sizeof(INT8) / sizeof(int); ++idx)
            (*ip)[idx] = (idx + 1) * (idx + 1);

        return ip;
    }

• squares is declared inside of the CppAnnotations::Virtual namespace.
• The definition outside of the namespace region requires us to use the fully qualified name of the function and of its return type.
• Inside the body of the function squares we are within the CppAnnotations::Virtual namespace, so inside the function fully qualified names (e.g., for INT8) are not required any more.

Finally, note that the function could also have been defined in the CppAnnotations region. In that case the Virtual namespace would have been required when defining squares() and when specifying its return type, while the internals of the function would remain the same:

    namespace CppAnnotations
    {
        namespace Virtual
        {
            void *pointer;

            typedef int INT8[8];

            INT8 *squares();
        }

        Virtual::INT8 *Virtual::squares()
        {
            INT8 *ip = new INT8[1];

            for (size_t idx = 0; idx != sizeof(INT8) / sizeof(int); ++idx)
                (*ip)[idx] = (idx + 1) * (idx + 1);

            return ip;
        }
    }

• Table of Contents
• Previous Chapter
• Next Chapter